Bionabu® · Vera Simulate™

Clinical Trial Risk Assessment Tool

Rehearse the protocol. Find where endpoints break. Fix it before first patient in.

Feasibility asks whether your study will fill. Vera Simulate™ asks whether it will capture its endpoints, and answers before first patient in, while change is still free.

One readout before first patient in

See where your study is fragile, visit by visit

Readiness scores, a protocol stress map and the three risks that matter most, on one page for senior teams. The full assessment sits behind it.

Executive summary · sample

Endpoint capture risk

Protocol rehearsal of NCT07530835, a published paediatric study with five intraoral-scan timepoints

The primary risk is endpoint capture, not recruitment.

Endpoint readiness62 /100At risk
Operational readiness74 /100At risk
Retention readiness58 /100Critical gap
Overall readiness65 /100At risk

Protocol stress map · capture-risk index by visit

Level and human driver per visit

Readiness bands75–100 Ready60–74 At risk0–59 Critical gap
From a Vera Simulate™ sample report. Built from the publicly available protocol only; no patient-level data. Scores are simulation outputs, directional by design.

What a recruitment-focused review would miss. Every endpoint in this study comes from one repeated scan. A single distressed moment at baseline or straight after treatment can void the primary and secondary endpoints for that child at once. The highest-value protection is upstream: making two specific scans capturable.

Complementary, not competing

A different question from feasibility, asked earlier

Traditional feasibility

Can we recruit?

  • Sites
  • Patients
  • Enrolment
Answers
Will the study fill?
Owner
Feasibility
Timing
At or after site activation
Unit
Sites and patient counts

Vera Simulate™ rehearsal

Can we capture the endpoint?

  • Protocol
  • Participant journey
  • Capture vulnerability
  • Endpoint readiness
Answers
Will it collect usable data?
Owner
Clinical Operations and RBQM
Timing
Before first patient in
Unit
Each endpoint and capture event

Feasibility fills the study; rehearsal protects its data. A study can pass feasibility and still lose its endpoints.

Know where it breaks

A protocol risk register, ranked by endpoint impact

Each endpoint is mapped to the capture events it depends on. Every predicted failure point is scored on likelihood and severity, where severity means what the failure does to the data, not how it feels in the room.

Know why it breaks

The human driver behind each risk, with its evidence

Each risk is traced to the behaviour that causes it and to a specific readiness lever. Every prediction carries a confidence level: structural, when the protocol makes it certain, or evidence-based, to calibrate once the trial runs.

Targeted preparation tools go only where the risk is: a short storyboard, a visual visit schedule or a checklist. The rest of the consent material stays as it is.

Know what to watch

A deviation forecast, handed to Vera Deviate™

Each predicted risk becomes the deviation it would generate, the monitoring signal that would catch it first and the trigger to act. Signals are written to be configured in Vera Deviate™ at study start, so the trial confirms or revises the forecast instead of rediscovering it from lost data.

Know whether to test it live

A clear decision on physical simulation

Vera Simulate™ is an analytical rehearsal. It tells you whether mock visits, family testing or PPI walkthroughs would add value, and exactly where to focus them. Most protocols don't need a physical rehearsal, and none need one end to end.

How it works

The protocol changes. The process doesn't.

An expert-led rehearsal run on our proprietary simulation model. The same seven steps apply to any protocol and therapeutic area.

Inputs · from the protocol

  • Endpoints and how they depend on each other
  • Visit schedule and visit complexity
  • Population and cohort risk factors
  • Capture procedures
  • Participant burden and retention exposure
  • Mitigations already available

Process · seven steps

  1. Map each endpoint to its capture events
  2. Walk the participant journey, visit by visit
  3. Identify capture vulnerabilities and human drivers
  4. Score likelihood × endpoint impact into a risk register
  5. Compute readiness scores from the register
  6. Forecast deviations and assign the signal that detects each
  7. Deliver the readout and hand off to Vera Deviate™

Outputs · your report

  • Readiness scorecard
  • Protocol stress map
  • Risk register with evidence and confidence
  • Mitigation plan with a named owner per risk
  • Deviation forecast with monitoring handoff
  • Physical simulation decision

No patient-level data required

Run before protocol lock or first patient in

Who uses it

One report, because each team owns a different link

Primary owner

Clinical Operations

What to change before the study opens, with a named owner for every risk.

Primary owner

RBQM

The deviation forecast, signals and triggers, defined before the trial begins.

Contributor

Patient Engagement

Why each risk emerges, and where preparation reduces it.

Contributor

Feasibility and start-up

An endpoint view alongside recruitment, and the failure modes to brief sites on.

Leadership

Trial Innovation and Portfolio

A repeatable readiness gate to compare studies and govern launch decisions.

Contributor

Data management

A first-pass quality standard and point-of-capture flags, set before enrolment.

The Vera Platform™

One continuous view of trial integrity, before and after first patient in

Vera Simulate™ forecasts where the study will break. Vera Deviate™ governs whether it does. The risks, deviations and signals carry across, so nothing is rediscovered.

Before first patient in Vera Simulate™

Clinical trial risk assessment: rehearse the protocol, score readiness, forecast deviations.

You are here
After first patient in Vera Deviate™

Protocol deviation management software: capture, review and close every deviation in one inspection-ready record.

Explore Vera Deviate™

See the full clinical trial risk management platform

Questions teams ask

Clinical trial risk assessment: common questions

What is a clinical trial risk assessment tool?

It identifies what could stop a study from producing usable, reliable data, and ranks those risks so the team can act before they occur. Vera Simulate™ focuses on endpoint capture: it rehearses the protocol visit by visit and shows where endpoints are likely to be lost, why, and what to change before first patient in.

How is Vera Simulate™ different from a feasibility assessment?

Feasibility asks whether the study will recruit. Vera Simulate™ asks whether it will capture its endpoints once participants are enrolled. The two are complementary: a study can pass feasibility and still lose endpoints at baseline, straight after treatment or at the final visit.

What do you need from us, and do you use patient data?

We work from the protocol: endpoints, visit schedule, population and capture procedures. No patient-level data is required. Sponsor parameters such as target enrolment or cost per procedure can be added to size the operational case, but they are optional.

Is Vera Simulate™ software we run ourselves?

No. Each rehearsal is expert-led by the Bionabu team using our proprietary simulation model. You receive a readout for senior teams and a full assessment with the risk register, mitigations, deviation forecast and monitoring handoff.

How does it support ICH E6(R3) and risk-based quality management?

ICH E6(R3) asks sponsors to identify factors critical to quality and manage risks to them in proportion to their importance. Vera Simulate™ produces that analysis for endpoint capture before the trial starts, with named owners, and pre-specifies the signals your RBQM team monitors once it is live.

Does it replace mock visits, PPI or patient engagement?

No. It decides whether a physical simulation is worth running and where to focus it, so you test the few high-risk moments rather than the whole protocol. Patient engagement and PPI stay in place; the rehearsal tells them where to aim.

What happens after first patient in?

The forecast deviations and monitoring signals are configured in Vera Deviate™, our protocol deviation management software. Observed deviations are then compared against the forecast, which confirms or revises the rehearsal.

Evidence base

An established method, applied where it has the most leverage

Vera Simulate™ applies clinical simulation and human-factors analysis at the moment before first patient in, when the protocol and operational plan can still absorb change.

Published precedent · Paediatric Drugs, 2025

High-fidelity simulation of a paediatric trial's key visits identified risks and needs before protocol finalisation, and framed the value as return on investment and return on engagement.

Read the study

Scope, stated plainly

  • Simulation-based and predictive; scores are directional and calibrated against your own data during the trial.
  • Does not assess clinical efficacy or safety.
  • Not a regulatory submission, and not a substitute for feasibility, statistical or quality review.
  • Preparation tools supplement the ICF and the consent conversation; they go through ethics committee review.

Bring one protocol. We'll show you where it breaks.

See a sample readout, or walk through your own protocol with our team in 30 minutes.